Posts Categorized As: Due Diligence

Blog Post #1661 – Workplace Injury Results in $65,000 Fine for Waterloo Company

by

Report from the Ontario government’s ‘Newsroom’

A worker, employed by Valley Blades Ltd., Waterloo, Ontario, a company that manufactures blades, cutting edges and other accessories for construction, mining and snow removal equipment, was injured after their clothing became entangled with operating machinery. The company failed, as an employer, to prohibit the worker from wearing loose clothing around a source of entanglement, as required by section 83(2) of Ontario Regulation 851/90, contrary to section 25(1)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Continue Reading

Blog Post #1659 – Workplace Fatality Results in $110,000 Fine for Brampton-based Construction Contractor

by

Report from the government of ‘Ontario’s Newsroom’

A worker, Frontline Cable and Gas Services Inc., of Brantford, Ontario, an excavating contractor, employed by was fatally injured when the employer failed to install blocking required to prevent the collapse or movement of a piece of equipment being repaired. The employer failed to ensure that the provisions of section 108 of Ontario Regulation 213/91 were complied with at a workplace, contrary to section 25(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Continue Reading

Blog Post #1658 – Workplace Injury Results in $65,000 Fine for Construction Equipment Manufacturer

by

Report from the government of Ontario’s ‘Newsroom’

A worker, employed by AMI Attachments Inc. of Hawksville, Ontario, a heavy construction equipment manufacturer, was seriously injured while operating a magnetic lifting device. AMI Attachments Inc. failed to assign a competent person to operate the lifting device, or to ensure the operator was instructed and accompanied by a competent person, as prescribed by section 51(2) of Ontario Regulation 851/90, contrary to sections 25(1)(c) and 66(1) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Continue Reading