Posts Categorized As: Machine Guarding

Blog Post #1705 – Workplace Injury Results In $55,000 Fine for Mississauga Bakery

Report from the government of Ontario’s ‘Newsroom’

A worker, employed by NuStef Baking Ltd., of Vancouver, British Columbia, was injured while adjusting the speed of a batter depositor on an industrial oven. By not ensuring the equipment was properly guarded, NuStef Baking Ltd. failed to ensure that the measures and procedures prescribed by section 25 of Ontario Regulation 851/90 were carried out at the workplace, contrary to sections 25(1)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Continue Reading

Blog Post #1700 – Mississauga Manufacturer Fined $120,000 After Workplace Fatality

Report from the government of Ontario’s ‘Newsroom’

A worker, employed by Allied Tooling Technologies Inc., a manufacturer of automotive, aerospace and industrial parts, was fatally injured while operating a CNC lathe machine. The company failed, as an employer, to ensure that the machine was equipped with a guard that prevented access to an exposed moving part, contrary to section 25(1)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act and section 24 of Ontario Regulation 851/90.

Continue Reading

Blog Post #1697 – Workplace Injury Results in $275,000 Fine for St. Catharines Company

Report from the government of Ontario’s ‘Newsroom’

A worker, employed by General Motors of Canada of St. Catharines, Ontario, an auto manufacturer, was injured when a CNC machine moved after the worker had entered to perform a maintenance task. The company failed, as an employer, to take every precaution reasonable in the circumstances for the protection of a worker, contrary to section 25(2)(h) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Continue Reading

Blog Post #1677 – Workplace Injury Results in $70,000 Fine for Etobicoke Company

Report from the government of Ontario’s ‘Newsroom’

A worker, employed by Spacefile International Corp. of Etobicoke, Ontario, a manufacturer of high-density storage products and solutions, was critically injured after operating a brake press. The company failed, as an employer, to ensure that the machine was guarded, as required by section 24 of Ontario Regulation 851/90, contrary to section 25(1)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Continue Reading