Posts Tagged As: Canada

Blog Post #1740 – Workplace Injury Results in $135,000 Fine for Vancouver Mining Company

Report from the government of Ontario’s ‘Newsroom’

A worker, employed by DMC Mining Services Ltd. of Vancouver, British Columbia, an underground mining company, was injured while removing an extra power cable from the wall of a mine shaft. The company failed, as an employer, to take every precaution reasonable in the circumstances for the protection of a worker, contrary to section 25(2)(h) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Continue Reading

Blog Post #1739 – Workplace Injury Results in $100,000 Fine for Quebec Drilling Company

Report from the government of Ontario’s ‘Newsroom’

A worker, employed by Orbit Garant Drilling Services Inc. of Val-d’Or, Quebec, a company providing drilling services to the mining sector, was injured while trying to free a water hose that was caught on a drill rod. The company failed, as an employer, to ensure that the measures and procedures prescribed by section 185(2) of Ontario Regulation 854/90 – ‘Mines and Mining Plants’ were carried out, contrary to section 25(1)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Continue Reading

Blog Post #1738 – Workplace Injury Results in $60,000 Fine for Niagara-on-the-Lake Manufacturer

Report from the government of Ontario’s ‘Newsroom’

A worker, employed by Genaire Ltd. of Niagara-on-the-lake, was injured while attempting to reopen a container of hazardous paint that had been improperly stored. The company failed, as an employer, to ensure that the measures and procedures prescribed by section 7(1)(c) of Ontario Regulation 860 were carried out in the workplace, contrary to section 25(1)(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Continue Reading

Blog Post #1737 – Workplace Injury Results in $130,000 Fine for Calgary-based Company

Report from the government of Ontario’s ‘Newsroom’

A worker, employed by NOVA Chemicals Corporation of Calgary, Alberta, a petrochemical manufacturer that operates facilities across Canada, sustained serious injuries after hot liquid was discharged from an exhaust stack during maintenance work. The company failed to provide information, instruction and supervision to protect workers from hazards associated with intermittent blowdown operations, contrary to section 25(2)(a) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act.

Continue Reading